You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International survey on NAT testing of blood donations: expanding implementation and yield from 1999 to 2009
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vox Sanguinis, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.01506.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W. K. Roth, M. P. Busch, A. Schuller, S. Ismay, A. Cheng, C. R. Seed, C. Jungbauer, P. M. Minsk, D. Sondag‐Thull, S. Wendel, J. E. Levi, M. Fearon, G. Delage, Y. Xie, I. Jukic′, P. Turek, H. Ullum, V. Tefanova, M. Tilk, R. Reimal, J. Castren, M. Naukkarinen, A. Assal, C. Jork, M. K. Hourfar, P. Michel, R. Offergeld, L. Pichl, M. Schmidt, V. Schottstedt, E. Seifried, F. Wagner, M. Weber‐Schehl, C. Politis, C. K. Lin, W. C. Tsoi, J. O’Riordan, A. Gottreich, E. Shinar, V. Yahalom, C. Velati, M. Satake, N. Sanad, I. Sisene, A. H. Bon, M. Koppelmann, P. Flanagan, O. Flesland, E. Brojer, M. Łętowska, F. Nascimento, E. Zhiburt, S. S. Chua, D. Teo, S. Levicnik Stezinar, M. Vermeulen, R. Reddy, Q. Park, E. Castro, A. Eiras, I. Gonzales Fraile, P. Torres, B. Ekermo, C. Niederhauser, H. Chen, S. Oota, L. J. Brant, R. Eglin, L. Jarvis, L. Mohabir, J. Brodsky, G. Foster, C. Jennings, E. Notari, S. Stramer, D. Kessler, C. Hillyer, H. Kamel, L. Katz, C. Taylor, S. Panzer, H.W. Reesink |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,224,658
of 24,618,500 outputs
Outputs from Vox Sanguinis
#231
of 1,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,911
of 134,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vox Sanguinis
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,874 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.