↓ Skip to main content

Perianal disease of tuberculous origin

Overview of attention for article published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Perianal disease of tuberculous origin
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, January 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf02235192
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Candela, P. Serrano, J. M. Arriero, A. Teruel, D. Reyes, R. Calpena

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Other 2 17%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#2,064
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,657
of 109,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.