You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mutations in EXTL3 Cause Neuro-immuno-skeletal Dysplasia Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Machteld M. Oud, Paul Tuijnenburg, Maja Hempel, Naomi van Vlies, Zemin Ren, Sacha Ferdinandusse, Machiel H. Jansen, René Santer, Jessika Johannsen, Chiara Bacchelli, Marielle Alders, Rui Li, Rosalind Davies, Lucie Dupuis, Catherine M. Cale, Ronald J.A. Wanders, Steven T. Pals, Louise Ocaka, Chela James, Ingo Müller, Kai Lehmberg, Tim Strom, Hartmut Engels, Hywel J. Williams, Phil Beales, Ronald Roepman, Patricia Dias, Han G. Brunner, Jan-Maarten Cobben, Christine Hall, Taila Hartley, Polona Le Quesne Stabej, Roberto Mendoza-Londono, E. Graham Davies, Sérgio B. de Sousa, Davor Lessel, Heleen H. Arts, Taco W. Kuijpers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,486,168
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#2,573
of 6,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,534
of 428,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#37
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.