↓ Skip to main content

BDDCS Applied to Over 900 Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
524 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1071 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
BDDCS Applied to Over 900 Drugs
Published in
The AAPS Journal, August 2011
DOI 10.1208/s12248-011-9290-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie Z. Benet, Fabio Broccatelli, Tudor I. Oprea

Abstract

Here, we compile the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) classification for 927 drugs, which include 30 active metabolites. Of the 897 parent drugs, 78.8% (707) are administered orally. Where the lowest measured solubility is found, this value is reported for 72.7% (513) of these orally administered drugs and a dose number is recorded. The measured values are reported for percent excreted unchanged in urine, LogP, and LogD (7.4) when available. For all 927 compounds, the in silico parameters for predicted Log solubility in water, calculated LogP, polar surface area, and the number of hydrogen bond acceptors and hydrogen bond donors for the active moiety are also provided, thereby allowing comparison analyses for both in silico and experimentally measured values. We discuss the potential use of BDDCS to estimate the disposition characteristics of novel chemicals (new molecular entities) in the early stages of drug discovery and development. Transporter effects in the intestine and the liver are not clinically relevant for BDDCS class 1 drugs, but potentially can have a high impact for class 2 (efflux in the gut, and efflux and uptake in the liver) and class 3 (uptake and efflux in both gut and liver) drugs. A combination of high dose and low solubility is likely to cause BDDCS class 4 to be underpopulated in terms of approved drugs (N = 53 compared with over 200 each in classes 1-3). The influence of several measured and in silico parameters in the process of BDDCS category assignment is discussed in detail.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,071 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1055 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 151 14%
Researcher 107 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 9%
Student > Master 66 6%
Other 44 4%
Other 117 11%
Unknown 489 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 285 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 87 8%
Chemistry 72 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 4%
Engineering 17 2%
Other 68 6%
Unknown 494 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,640,201
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#95
of 1,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,344
of 120,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them