| Title |
Ethical Issues in Tissue Banking for Research: The Prospects and Pitfalls of Setting International Standards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:meta.0000033773.44765.7c |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen J. Maschke, Thomas H. Murray |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#138
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,865
of 64,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.