↓ Skip to main content

An Ethical Analysis of International Health Priority-Setting

Overview of attention for article published in Health Care Analysis, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
An Ethical Analysis of International Health Priority-Setting
Published in
Health Care Analysis, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10728-007-0065-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuala Kenny, Christine Joffres

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Social Sciences 9 14%
Philosophy 5 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Analysis
#133
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,529
of 67,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Analysis
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them