↓ Skip to main content

Electronic reminders to improve medication adherence—are they acceptable to the patient?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Electronic reminders to improve medication adherence—are they acceptable to the patient?
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11096-009-9327-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Sahm, Aoife MacCurtain, John Hayden, Cicely Roche, Helen L. Richards

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Psychology 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Computer Science 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,343
of 102,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.