You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduction in retained activity participation is associated with depressive symptoms 3 months after mild stroke: An observational cohort study.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2340/16501977-2184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Tse, Jacinta Douglas, Primrose Lentin, Thomas Lindén, Leonid Churilov, Henry Ma, Stephen Davis, Geoffrey Donnan, Leeanne M Carey |
| Abstract |
To quantify the association of depressive symptoms with retained activity participation 3 months post-stroke, after adjusting for neurological stroke severity and age. A cross-sectional observational study of retained activity participation and depressive symptoms in stroke survivors with ischaemic stroke. One hundred stroke survivors with mild neurological stroke severity. One hundred stroke survivors were recruited from 5 metropolitan hospitals and reviewed at 3 months post-stroke using measures of activity participation, Activity Card Sort-Australia, and depressive symptoms, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Structured Interview Guide (MADRS-SIGMA). The median percentage of retained overall activity participation was 97%, (interquartile range 79-100%). Using multiple median regression, 1 point increase in the MADRS-SIGMA was associated with a median decrease of 0.7% (95% CI -1.4 to -0.1, p=0.02) of retained overall activity participation, assuming similar neurological stroke severity and age. The findings of this study establish the association of depressive symptoms with retained activity participation 3 months post-stroke in stroke survivors with mild neurological stroke severity. Clinical rehabilitation recommendations to enhance activity participation need to account for those with even mild depressive symptoms post-stroke. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#1,196
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,560
of 421,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#64
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.