↓ Skip to main content

The quality of private pharmacy services in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
The quality of private pharmacy services in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11096-009-9294-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felicity Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 178 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Lecturer 7 4%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 44 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 33 18%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 55 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,235
of 107,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.