| Title |
Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Diabetologica, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00592-009-0143-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaomin Hu, Wei Liu, Yawen Chen, Ming Zhang, Lihua Wang, Huan Zhou, Peihong Wu, Xiangyu Teng, Ying Dong, Jia wen Zhou, Hua Xu, Jun Zheng, Shengxian Li, Tao Tao, Yumei Hu, Yun Jia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,722,374
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#76
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,621
of 94,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them