↓ Skip to main content

Automated Antibody De Novo Sequencing and Its Utility in Biopharmaceutical Discovery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Automated Antibody De Novo Sequencing and Its Utility in Biopharmaceutical Discovery
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13361-016-1580-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Ilker Sen, Wilfred H Tang, Shruti Nayak, Yong J Kil, Marshall Bern, Berk Ozoglu, Beatrix Ueberheide, Darryl Davis, Christopher Becker

Abstract

Applications of antibody de novo sequencing in the biopharmaceutical industry range from the discovery of new antibody drug candidates to identifying reagents for research and determining the primary structure of innovator products for biosimilar development. When murine, phage display, or patient-derived monoclonal antibodies against a target of interest are available, but the cDNA or the original cell line is not, de novo protein sequencing is required to humanize and recombinantly express these antibodies, followed by in vitro and in vivo testing for functional validation. Availability of fully automated software tools for monoclonal antibody de novo sequencing enables efficient and routine analysis. Here, we present a novel method to automatically de novo sequence antibodies using mass spectrometry and the Supernovo software. The robustness of the algorithm is demonstrated through a series of stress tests. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 7 11%
Unspecified 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 29%
Chemistry 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Unspecified 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,954
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#938
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,039
of 420,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#8
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.