| Title |
ZNF804A rs1344706 interacts with COMT rs4680 to affect prefrontal volume in healthy adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Imaging and Behavior, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11682-016-9671-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiang Xu, Yongqin Xiong, Congcong Yuan, Feng Liu, Fangshi Zhao, Junlin Shen, Wen Qin, Chunshui Yu |
| Abstract |
The biological function of ZNF804A rs1344706, the first genome-wide supported risk variant of schizophrenia, remains largely unknown. Based on the upregulating effect of ZNF804A on the expression of COMT, we hypothesize that ZNF804A may affect grey matter volume (GMV) by interacting with COMT. Voxel-based morphometry was applied to analyze the main and interaction effects of ZNF804A rs1344706 and COMT rs4680 on brain GMV in 274 healthy young human subjects. The GMV of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) showed a significant COMT rs4680 × ZNF804A rs1344706 interaction, manifesting as an inverted U-shape modulation by the presumed dopamine signaling. In COMT Met-allele carriers, the ZNF804A TG heterozygotes showed greater GMV in the left DLPFC than both GG and TT homozygotes. In COMT Val/Val homozygotes, however, the ZNF804A TG heterozygotes exhibited smaller GMV in the left DLPFC than GG homozygotes and comparable GMV with TT homozygotes. These findings suggest that ZNF804A affects the GMV of the prefrontal cortex by interacting with COMT, which may improve our understanding of neurobiological effect of ZNF804A and its association with schizophrenia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 20% |
| Psychology | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,387,030
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#668
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,453
of 422,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.