You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The DIAMOND (DHA Intake And Measurement Of Neural Development) Study: a double-masked, randomized controlled clinical trial of the maturation of infant visual acuity as a function of the dietary level of docosahexaenoic acid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28557 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eileen E Birch, Susan E Carlson, Dennis R Hoffman, Kathleen M Fitzgerald-Gustafson, Valeria L N Fu, James R Drover, Yolanda S Castañeda, Laura Minns, Dianna K H Wheaton, David Mundy, John Marunycz, Deborah A Diersen-Schade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 58 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,664,164
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2,905
of 12,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,414
of 172,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#30
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.