| Title |
A high density physical map of chromosome 1BL supports evolutionary studies, map-based cloning and sequencing in wheat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romain Philippe, Etienne Paux, Isabelle Bertin, Pierre Sourdille, Fréderic Choulet, Christel Laugier, Hana Šimková, Jan Šafář, Arnaud Bellec, Sonia Vautrin, Zeev Frenkel, Federica Cattonaro, Federica Magni, Simone Scalabrin, Mihaela M Martis, Klaus FX Mayer, Abraham Korol, Hélène Bergès, Jaroslav Doležel, Catherine Feuillet |
| Abstract |
As for other major crops, achieving a complete wheat genome sequence is essential for the application of genomics to breeding new and improved varieties. To overcome the complexities of the large, highly repetitive and hexaploid wheat genome, the International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium established a chromosome-based strategy that was validated by the construction of the physical map of chromosome 3B. Here, we present improved strategies for the construction of highly integrated and ordered wheat physical maps, using chromosome 1BL as a template, and illustrate their potential for evolutionary studies and map-based cloning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| China | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 30% |
| Researcher | 18 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2013.
All research outputs
#1,789,672
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,484
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,014
of 208,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#20
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.