You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature12323 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ludovic Orlando, Aurélien Ginolhac, Guojie Zhang, Duane Froese, Anders Albrechtsen, Mathias Stiller, Mikkel Schubert, Enrico Cappellini, Bent Petersen, Ida Moltke, Philip L. F. Johnson, Matteo Fumagalli, Julia T. Vilstrup, Maanasa Raghavan, Thorfinn Korneliussen, Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas, Josef Vogt, Damian Szklarczyk, Christian D. Kelstrup, Jakob Vinther, Andrei Dolocan, Jesper Stenderup, Amhed M. V. Velazquez, James Cahill, Morten Rasmussen, Xiaoli Wang, Jiumeng Min, Grant D. Zazula, Andaine Seguin-Orlando, Cecilie Mortensen, Kim Magnussen, John F. Thompson, Jacobo Weinstock, Kristian Gregersen, Knut H. Røed, Véra Eisenmann, Carl J. Rubin, Donald C. Miller, Douglas F. Antczak, Mads F. Bertelsen, Søren Brunak, Khaled A. S. Al-Rasheid, Oliver Ryder, Leif Andersson, John Mundy, Anders Krogh, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Kurt Kjær, Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten, Lars Juhl Jensen, Jesper V. Olsen, Michael Hofreiter, Rasmus Nielsen, Beth Shapiro, Jun Wang, Eske Willerslev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Turkey | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Romania | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 56% |
| Scientists | 38 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 916 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 866 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 225 | 25% |
| Researcher | 165 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 117 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 107 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 35 | 4% |
| Other | 151 | 16% |
| Unknown | 116 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 411 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 152 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 40 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 26 | 3% |
| Other | 108 | 12% |
| Unknown | 143 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 964. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,415
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,740
of 98,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 209,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#9
of 1,019 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,019 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.