↓ Skip to main content

Recalibration of the Klales et al. (2012) method of sexing the human innominate for Mexican populations

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physical Anthropology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recalibration of the Klales et al. (2012) method of sexing the human innominate for Mexican populations
Published in
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/ajpa.23157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge A. Gómez‐Valdés, Antinea Menéndez Garmendia, Lizbeth García‐Barzola, Gabriela Sánchez‐Mejorada, Carlos Karam, José Pablo Baraybar, Alexandra Klales

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of the Klales et al. (2012) equation for sex estimation in contemporary Mexican population. Our investigation was carried out on a sample of 203 left innominates of identified adult skeletons from the UNAM-Collection and the Santa María Xigui Cemetery, in Central Mexico. The Klales' original equation produces a sex bias in sex estimation against males (86-92% accuracy versus 100% accuracy in females). Based on these results, the Klales et al. (2012) method was recalibrated for a new cutt-of-point for sex estimation in contemporary Mexican populations. The results show cross-validated classification accuracy rates as high as 100% after recalibrating the original logistic regression equation. Recalibration improved classification accuracy and eliminated sex bias. This new formula will improve sex estimation for Mexican contemporary populations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Arts and Humanities 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physical Anthropology
#3,438
of 3,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,955
of 422,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physical Anthropology
#44
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.