You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors contributing to the longevity of the commercial use of crocodiles by Indigenous people in remote Northern Australia: a case study
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Rangeland Journal, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1071/rj11082 |
Authors |
B. J. Austin, B. Corey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 28% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 28% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Rangeland Journal
#93
of 277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,536
of 186,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Rangeland Journal
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them