You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2013-05-501569 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michele Baccarani, Michael W. Deininger, Gianantonio Rosti, Andreas Hochhaus, Simona Soverini, Jane F. Apperley, Francisco Cervantes, Richard E. Clark, Jorge E. Cortes, François Guilhot, Henrik Hjorth-Hansen, Timothy P. Hughes, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Dong-Wook Kim, Richard A. Larson, Jeffrey H. Lipton, François-Xavier Mahon, Giovanni Martinelli, Jiri Mayer, Martin C. Müller, Dietger Niederwieser, Fabrizio Pane, Jerald P. Radich, Philippe Rousselot, Giuseppe Saglio, Susanne Saußele, Charles Schiffer, Richard Silver, Bengt Simonsson, Juan-Luis Steegmann, John M. Goldman, Rüdiger Hehlmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,005 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 981 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 150 | 15% |
| Other | 112 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 111 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 108 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 100 | 10% |
| Other | 220 | 22% |
| Unknown | 204 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 440 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 118 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 35 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 1% |
| Other | 66 | 7% |
| Unknown | 243 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,691,510
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#1,510
of 33,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,027
of 210,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#16
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.