| Title |
A revised look: EPA rulemaking processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13412-013-0138-8 |
| Authors |
Jeffrey J. Cook, Sara R. Rinfret |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Researcher | 2 | 29% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,054,256
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
#125
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,366
of 197,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.