| Title |
Lower incidence of emergence agitation in children after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00540-013-1656-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akihiro Kanaya, Norifumi Kuratani, Daizoh Satoh, Shin Kurosawa |
| Abstract |
Emergence agitation (EA) from general anesthesia has been reported as an adverse effect of sevoflurane in children. We describe a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the incidence of EA between children who underwent sevoflurane anesthesia and those who underwent propofol anesthesia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 32% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 53% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,038,182
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#293
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,670
of 196,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.