You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cervical Muscle Activity During Loaded Arm Lifts in Patients 10 Years Postsurgery for Cervical Disc Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anneli L.C. Peolsson, Michael N. Peolsson, Gwendolen A. Jull, Shaun P. O´Leary |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical activity of the neck muscles during loaded arm lifting tasks in individuals with long-standing disability after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with that of healthy controls. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2013.
All research outputs
#16,737,737
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#934
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,299
of 209,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.