↓ Skip to main content

TALEN or Cas9 – Rapid, Efficient and Specific Choices for Genome Modifications

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetics and Genomics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 846)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
31 patents
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
660 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TALEN or Cas9 – Rapid, Efficient and Specific Choices for Genome Modifications
Published in
Journal of Genetics and Genomics, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.03.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuanxian Wei, Jiyong Liu, Zhongsheng Yu, Bo Zhang, Guanjun Gao, Renjie Jiao

Abstract

Precise modifications of complex genomes at the single nucleotide level have been one of the big goals for scientists working in basic and applied genetics, including biotechnology, drug development, gene therapy and synthetic biology. However, the relevant techniques for making these manipulations in model organisms and human cells have been lagging behind the rapid high throughput studies in the post-genomic era with a bottleneck of low efficiency, time consuming and laborious manipulation, and off-targeting problems. Recent discoveries of TALEs (transcription activator-like effectors) coding system and CRISPR (clusters of regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) immune system in bacteria have enabled the development of customized TALENs (transcription activator-like effector nucleases) and CRISPR/Cas9 to rapidly edit genomic DNA in a variety of cell types, including human cells, and different model organisms at a very high efficiency and specificity. In this review, we first briefly summarize the development and applications of TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technologies; compare the advantages and constraints of each method; particularly, discuss the expected applications of both techniques in the field of site-specific genome modification and stem cell based gene therapy; finally, propose the future directions and perspectives for readers to make the choices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 660 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
Germany 5 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 618 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 161 24%
Researcher 138 21%
Student > Master 94 14%
Student > Bachelor 76 12%
Student > Postgraduate 34 5%
Other 104 16%
Unknown 53 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 366 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 136 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 2%
Engineering 9 1%
Other 28 4%
Unknown 69 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,034,271
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetics and Genomics
#11
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,551
of 211,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetics and Genomics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.