↓ Skip to main content

T-cell receptor-engineered T cells for cancer treatment: current status and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
8 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
T-cell receptor-engineered T cells for cancer treatment: current status and future directions
Published in
Protein & Cell, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13238-016-0367-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Ping, Chaojun Liu, Yi Zhang

Abstract

T-cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T cells are a novel option for adoptive cell therapy used for the treatment of several advanced forms of cancer. Work using TCR-engineered T cells began more than two decades ago, with numerous preclinical studies showing that such cells could mediate tumor lysis and eradication. The success of these trials provided the foundation for clinical trials, including recent clinical successes using TCR-engineered T cells to target New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NY-ESO-1). These successes demonstrate the potential of this approach to treat cancer. In this review, we provide a perspective on the current and future applications of TCR-engineered T cells for the treatment of cancer. Our summary focuses on TCR activation and both pre-clinical and clinical applications of TCR-engineered T cells. We also discuss how to enhance the function of TCR-engineered T cells and prolong their longevity in the tumor microenvironment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 265 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 19%
Student > Bachelor 48 18%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 59 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 39 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 65 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,085,973
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#120
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,487
of 422,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.