↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of coagulation assays versus LC-MS/MS for determinations of dabigatran concentrations in plasma

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of coagulation assays versus LC-MS/MS for determinations of dabigatran concentrations in plasma
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00228-013-1550-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jovan P. Antovic, Mika Skeppholm, Jaak Eintrei, Elisabet Eriksson Boija, Lisbeth Söderblom, Eva-Marie Norberg, Liselotte Onelöv, Yuko Rönquist-Nii, Anton Pohanka, Olof Beck, Paul Hjemdahl, Rickard E. Malmström

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 13%
Chemistry 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,123,410
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#811
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,648
of 212,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.