↓ Skip to main content

Can financial statement analysis beat consensus analysts’ recommendations?

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Accounting Studies, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Can financial statement analysis beat consensus analysts’ recommendations?
Published in
Review of Accounting Studies, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11142-010-9124-5
Authors

James M. Wahlen, Matthew M. Wieland

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 117 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 29%
Student > Master 18 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Professor 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 64 53%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20 17%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,185,999
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#59
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,808
of 106,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them