↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation – a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation – a systematic review
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-10-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mingming Zhang, T Claire Davies, Shane Xie

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of studies that investigated the effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle motor and function recovery from musculoskeletal or neurologic ankle injuries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 364 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 16%
Student > Bachelor 42 11%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 83 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 103 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 9%
Neuroscience 19 5%
Computer Science 10 3%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 95 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#524
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,754
of 210,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.