↓ Skip to main content

DMBT1 expression in biliary carcinogenesis with correlation of clinicopathological data

Overview of attention for article published in Histopathology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DMBT1 expression in biliary carcinogenesis with correlation of clinicopathological data
Published in
Histopathology, March 2017
DOI 10.1111/his.13175
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Deleted in Malignant Brain Tumors 1 (DMBT1) exerts functions in the regulation of epithelial differentiation and inflammation and has been proposed as tumor suppressor. Since chronic inflammation is a hallmark of cholangiocarcinogenesis, the aim of the study was to investigate the expression of DMBT1 in biliary tract cancer (BTC) and to correlate the expression with clinicopathological data. The expression of DMBT1 protein was examined immunohistochemically in 157 BTC patients (41 intrahepatic (ICC), 60 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ECC), and 56 adenocarcinomas of the gallbladder (GBAC)). Additionally, 56 samples of high grade biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN 3) and 92 corresponding samples of histological non-neoplastic biliary tract tissues were included. DMBT1 expression was significantly increased in BilIN 3 compared to normal tissue (P < 0.0001) and BTC (P < 0.0001). BTC showed no significant difference in DMBT1 expression compared to non-neoplastic biliary tissue (P = 0.315). Absent DMBT1 expression in non-neoplastic biliary tissue of BTC patients was associated with poorer survival (P = 0.027). DMBT1 expression was significantly correlated with patients' age (P < 0.001). DMBT1 is differently expressed in cholangiocarcinogenesis and poorer patients survival rates are associated with absent DMBT1 expression in non-neoplastic biliary tissue, suggesting a tumorsuppressive role of DMBT1 in early cholangiocarcinogenesis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 25%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,699,002
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#2,669
of 3,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,439
of 312,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#46
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.