↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Interventions of QEEG-guided Biofeedback, Computers, Strategies, and Medications

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Efficacy of Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Interventions of QEEG-guided Biofeedback, Computers, Strategies, and Medications
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10484-008-9056-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirtley E. Thornton, Dennis P. Carmody

Abstract

The onset of cognitive rehabilitation brought with it a hope for an effective treatment for the traumatic brain injured subject. This paper reviews the empirical reports of changes in cognitive functioning after treatment and compares the relative effectiveness of several treatments including computer interventions, cognitive strategies, EEG biofeedback, and medications. The cognitive functions that are reviewed include auditory memory, attention and problem solving. The significance of the change in cognitive function is assessed in two ways that include effect size and longevity of effect. These analyses complement the previously published meta-reviews by adding these two criteria and include reports of EEG biofeedback, which is shown to be an effective intervention for auditory memory.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 171 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Master 22 12%
Other 16 9%
Other 44 24%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,335,210
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#152
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,956
of 83,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them