↓ Skip to main content

Relationships Between Integration and Drug Use Among Deported Migrants in Tijuana, Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Relationships Between Integration and Drug Use Among Deported Migrants in Tijuana, Mexico
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10903-016-0518-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle Horyniak, Miguel Pinedo, Jose Luis Burgos, Victoria D. Ojeda

Abstract

Deported migrants face numerous challenges which may elevate their risk for drug use. We examined relationships between integration and drug use among deported migrants in Tijuana, Mexico. A cross-sectional survey conducted at a free health clinic included 255 deported Mexican-born migrants residing in Tijuana ≥6 months. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between variables across four integration domains (public participation, social connections, macro-level facilitators and foundations) and recent (past 6-month) drug use. The prevalence of recent drug use was 46 %. Having sought work in Tijuana in the past 6 months, greater household affluence, lifetime history of incarceration in both US and Mexico, and lacking health insurance were independently associated with recent drug use. Policies that support access to employment, adequate housing and healthcare in Mexico, particularly for justice-involved deportees, may facilitate successful integration and reduce potential stressors that may contribute to drug use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Lecturer 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Social Sciences 14 14%
Psychology 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,645,647
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#752
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,644
of 317,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.