↓ Skip to main content

Bone in celiac disease

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Bone in celiac disease
Published in
Osteoporosis International, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00198-008-0624-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.-L. Bianchi, M. T. Bardella

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,914,220
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,283
of 3,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,163
of 81,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.