↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and Histologic Diagnostic Guidelines for Psoriasis: A Critical Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Clinical and Histologic Diagnostic Guidelines for Psoriasis: A Critical Review
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12016-012-8305-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Ann N. Johnson, April W. Armstrong

Abstract

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disease that is associated with joint, psychiatric, and cardiovascular comorbidities. Diagnosis of plaque psoriasis is dependent primarily on characteristic physical findings and history. Given the varied clinical presentations of psoriasis and its mimicry to other papulosquamous skin diseases, it may be difficult for nondermatologists to diagnose psoriasis. Currently, no diagnostic criteria for plaque psoriasis have been validated in clinical studies. In this paper, we provide diagnostic guidelines for the nondermatologist to aid them in recognizing psoriasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
India 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,709,838
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#309
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,205
of 252,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.