↓ Skip to main content

Photosynthetic responses of a dominant C4 grass to an experimental heat wave are mediated by soil moisture

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Photosynthetic responses of a dominant C4 grass to an experimental heat wave are mediated by soil moisture
Published in
Oecologia, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00442-016-3755-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. L. Hoover, A. K. Knapp, M. D. Smith

Abstract

Extreme heat waves and drought are predicted to increase in frequency and magnitude with climate change. These extreme events often co-occur, making it difficult to separate their direct and indirect effects on important ecophysiological and carbon cycling processes such as photosynthesis. Here, we assessed the independent and interactive effects of experimental heat waves and drought on photosynthesis in Andropogon gerardii, a dominant C4 grass in a native mesic grassland. We experimentally imposed a two-week heat wave at four intensity levels under two contrasting soil moisture regimes: a well-watered control and an extreme drought. There were three main findings from this study. First, the soil moisture regimes had large effects on canopy temperature, leading to extremely high temperatures under drought and low temperatures under well-watered conditions. Second, soil moisture mediated the photosynthetic response to heat; heat reduced photosynthesis under the well-watered control, but not under the extreme drought treatment. Third, the effects of heat on photosynthesis appeared to be driven by a direct thermal effect, not indirectly through other environmental or ecophysiological variables. These results suggest that while photosynthesis in this dominant C4 grass is sensitive to heat stress, this sensitivity can be overwhelmed by extreme drought stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 48%
Environmental Science 5 19%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,018,824
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,845
of 4,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,094
of 316,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#26
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.