You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic engineering of multispecies microbial cell factories as an alternative for bioenergy production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Biotechnology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.05.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan Cesar Federico Ortiz-Marquez, Mauro Do Nascimento, Jonathan Philip Zehr, Leonardo Curatti |
| Abstract |
There is currently much interest in developing technology to use microlgae or cyanobacteria for the production of bioenergy and biomaterials. Here, we summarize some remarkable achievements in strains improvement by traditional genetic engineering and discuss common drawbacks for further progress. We present general knowledge on natural microalgal-bacterial mutualistic interactions and discuss the potential of recent developments in genetic engineering of multispecies microbial cell factories. This synthetic biology approach would rely on the assembly of complex metabolic networks from optimized metabolic modules such as photosynthetic or nitrogen-fixing parts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 215 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 26% |
| Researcher | 45 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 17% |
| Engineering | 19 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#2,485
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,524
of 209,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.