↓ Skip to main content

Fibroblast growth on micro- and nanopatterned surfaces prepared by a novel sol–gel phase separation method

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Fibroblast growth on micro- and nanopatterned surfaces prepared by a novel sol–gel phase separation method
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10856-012-4829-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Reemann, Triin Kangur, Martin Pook, Madis Paalo, Liis Nurmis, Ilmar Kink, Orm Porosaar, Külli Kingo, Eero Vasar, Sulev Kõks, Viljar Jaks, Martin Järvekülg

Abstract

Physical characteristics of the growth substrate including nano- and microstructure play crucial role in determining the behaviour of the cells in a given biological context. To test the effect of varying the supporting surface structure on cell growth we applied a novel sol-gel phase separation-based method to prepare micro- and nanopatterned surfaces with round surface structure features. Variation in the size of structural elements was achieved by solvent variation and adjustment of sol concentration. Growth characteristics and morphology of primary human dermal fibroblasts were found to be significantly modulated by the microstructure of the substrate. The increase in the size of the structural elements, lead to increased inhibition of cell growth, altered morphology (increased cytoplasmic volume), enlarged cell shape, decrease in the number of filopodia) and enhancement of cell senescence. These effects are likely mediated by the decreased contact between the cell membrane and the growth substrate. However, in the case of large surface structural elements other factors like changes in the 3D topology of the cell's cytoplasm might also play a role.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Estonia 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Engineering 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,195,877
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#1,288
of 1,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,377
of 278,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.