You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Oral Administration of Defatted Chicken Skin Powder on Dry Skin in Humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3136/nskkk.60.218 |
| Authors |
Jun Kawamura, Satoshi Kotoura, Takako Okuyama, Mari Furumoto, Hidetaka Fuchuu, Kiyotaka Miake, Masaaki Sugiyama, Masao Ohnishi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 50% |
| Researcher | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,564,809
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#58
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,115
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.