↓ Skip to main content

Using landscape graphs to delineate ecologically functional areas

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Ecology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Using landscape graphs to delineate ecologically functional areas
Published in
Landscape Ecology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10980-016-0445-z
Authors

Jean-Christophe Foltête, Gilles Vuidel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 34%
Environmental Science 21 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,525,776
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#1,322
of 1,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,652
of 323,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.