↓ Skip to main content

Schizophrenia: Impact on Family Dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
Title
Schizophrenia: Impact on Family Dynamics
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11920-017-0756-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar, Mar Rus-Calafell, Thomas K. J. Craig, Matias Irarrazaval, Alfonso Urzúa, Laurent Boyer, David R. Williams

Abstract

In many societies, family members are now the primary caregivers of mental health patients, taking on responsibilities traditionally under the purview of hospitals and medical professionals. The impact of this shift on the family is high, having both an emotional and economic toll. The aim of this paper is to review the main changes that occur in family dynamics for patients with schizophrenia. The article addresses three central themes: (i) changes in the family at the onset of the disorder, (ii) consequences for family members because of their caregiver role, and (iii) family interventions aimed at improving the complex dynamics within the family. After analyzing and discussing these themes, it is observed that despite advances in the field, the viability of taking care of a patient with schizophrenia by the family remains a challenge. Improving care will require commitments from the family, the mental health service system, and local and national governments for greater investments to improve the quality of life of society in general and individuals with schizophrenia in particular.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 345 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 26%
Student > Master 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Researcher 21 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 4%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 111 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 18%
Psychology 39 11%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 120 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,682,586
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#199
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,964
of 423,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.