| Title |
When Kamay Met Hill: Organisational Ethics in Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-017-3435-4 |
| Authors |
Jonathan A. Batten, Igor Lončarski, Peter G. Szilagyi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 15% |
| Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 41% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,437,553
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,086
of 2,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,095
of 419,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#42
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.