↓ Skip to main content

Is your choice my choice? The owners’ effect on pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
Title
Is your choice my choice? The owners’ effect on pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task
Published in
Animal Cognition, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10071-007-0102-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Prato-Previde, S. Marshall-Pescini, P. Valsecchi

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of owners on their dogs' performance in a food choice task using either different or equal quantities of food. Fifty-four pet dogs were tested in three different conditions. In Condition 1 we evaluated their ability to choose between a large and small amount of food (quantity discrimination task). In Condition 2 dogs were again presented with a choice between the large and small food quantity, but only after having witnessed their owner favouring the small quantity. In Condition 3 dogs were given a choice between two equally small quantities of food having witnessed their owner favouring either one or the other. A strong effect of the owner on the dogs' performance was observed. In Condition 1 dogs as a group chose significantly more often the large food quantity, thus showing their ability to solve the quantity discrimination task. After observing their owner expressing a preference for the small food quantity they chose the large quantity of food significantly less than in the independent choice situation. The tendency to conform to the owner's choice was higher when the dogs had to choose between equally small quantities of food (Condition 3) rather than between a large and a small one (Condition 2). These results provide evidence that dogs can be influenced by their owners even when their indications are clearly in contrast with direct perceptual information, thus leading dogs to ultimately make counterproductive choices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Hungary 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Austria 3 1%
India 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 267 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 24%
Researcher 54 18%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Other 25 9%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 35 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 138 47%
Psychology 46 16%
Environmental Science 24 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 3%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 47 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,160,683
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#466
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,670
of 67,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them