↓ Skip to main content

Ancient pests: the season of the Santorini Minoan volcanic eruption and a date from insect chitin

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Ancient pests: the season of the Santorini Minoan volcanic eruption and a date from insect chitin
Published in
The Science of Nature, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00114-013-1068-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Panagiotakopulu, Thomas Higham, Anaya Sarpaki, Paul Buckland, Christos Doumas

Abstract

Attributing a season and a date to the volcanic eruption of Santorini in the Aegean has become possible by using preserved remains of the bean weevil, Bruchus rufipes, pests of pulses, from the storage jars of the West House, in the Bronze Age settlement at Akrotiri. We have applied an improved pre-treatment methodology for dating the charred insects, and this provides a date of 1744-1538 BC. This date is within the range of others obtained from pulses from the same context and confirms the utility of chitin as a dating material. Based on the nature of the insect material and the life cycle of the species involved, we argue for a summer eruption, which took place after harvest, shortly after this material was transported into the West House storeroom.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
Malta 1 3%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 8 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 14%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,504,449
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#213
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,022
of 198,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.