Title |
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) and Microtechnology Sensors in Team Sports: A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sports Medicine, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40279-013-0069-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cloe Cummins, Rhonda Orr, Helen O’Connor, Cameron West |
Abstract |
Use of Global positioning system (GPS) technology in team sport permits measurement of player position, velocity, and movement patterns. GPS provides scope for better understanding of the specific and positional physiological demands of team sport and can be used to design training programs that adequately prepare athletes for competition with the aim of optimizing on-field performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
Australia | 6 | 10% |
Spain | 5 | 9% |
Chile | 3 | 5% |
Ireland | 3 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 33 | 57% |
Scientists | 21 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Qatar | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1227 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 254 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 182 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 144 | 12% |
Researcher | 74 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 70 | 6% |
Other | 226 | 18% |
Unknown | 293 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 659 | 53% |
Engineering | 51 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 3% |
Computer Science | 29 | 2% |
Other | 96 | 8% |
Unknown | 327 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,061,209
of 24,719,968 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#929
of 2,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,636
of 200,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,719,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.