You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DNA methylation heterogeneity defines a disease spectrum in Ewing sarcoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm.4273 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan C Sheffield, Gaelle Pierron, Johanna Klughammer, Paul Datlinger, Andreas Schönegger, Michael Schuster, Johanna Hadler, Didier Surdez, Delphine Guillemot, Eve Lapouble, Paul Freneaux, Jacqueline Champigneulle, Raymonde Bouvier, Diana Walder, Ingeborg M Ambros, Caroline Hutter, Eva Sorz, Ana T Amaral, Enrique de Álava, Katharina Schallmoser, Dirk Strunk, Beate Rinner, Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger, Berthold Huppertz, Andreas Leithner, Gonzague de Pinieux, Philippe Terrier, Valérie Laurence, Jean Michon, Ruth Ladenstein, Wolfgang Holter, Reinhard Windhager, Uta Dirksen, Peter F Ambros, Olivier Delattre, Heinrich Kovar, Christoph Bock, Eleni M Tomazou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Austria | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Argentina | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 57% |
| Scientists | 30 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 271 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 21% |
| Researcher | 52 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 82 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2021.
All research outputs
#383,177
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,347
of 9,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,336
of 428,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#17
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.