↓ Skip to main content

Bacillus subtilis based-formulation for the control of postbloom fruit drop of citrus

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Bacillus subtilis based-formulation for the control of postbloom fruit drop of citrus
Published in
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11274-016-2157-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana Nadjara Klein, Aline Caroline da Silva, Katia Cristina Kupper

Abstract

Postbloom fruit drop (PFD) caused by Colletotrichum acutatum affects flowers and causes early fruit drop in all commercial varieties of citrus. Biological control with the isolate ACB-69 of Bacillus subtilis has been considered as a potential method for controlling this disease. This study aimed to develop and optimize a B. subtilis based-formulation with a potential for large-scale applications and evaluate its effect on C. acutatum in vitro and in vivo. Bacillus subtilis based-formulations were developed using different carrier materials, and their ability to control PFD was evaluated. The results of the assays led to the selection of the B. subtilis based-formulation with talc + urea (0.02 %) and talc + ammonium molybdate (1 mM), which inhibited mycelial growth and germination of C. acutatum. Studies with detached citrus flowers showed that the formulations were effective in controlling the pathogen. In field conditions, talc + urea (0.02 %) provided 73 % asymptomatic citrus flowers and 56 % of the average number of effective fruit (ANEF), equating with fungicide treatment. On the contrary, non-treated trees had 8.8 % of asymptomatic citrus flowers and 0.83 % ANEF. The results suggest that B. subtilis based-formulations with talc as the carrier supplemented with a nitrogen source had a high potential for PFD control.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,259,973
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#247
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,294
of 315,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.