Title |
Quadriceps function following ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: implications for optimisation of current practices
|
---|---|
Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00167-013-2577-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alli Gokeler, Marsha Bisschop, Anne Benjaminse, Greg D. Myer, Peter Eppinga, Egbert Otten |
Abstract |
To determine the most effective practices for quadriceps strengthening after ACL reconstruction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 8 | 35% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
Scientists | 8 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 373 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 76 | 20% |
Student > Master | 73 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 6% |
Researcher | 17 | 4% |
Other | 62 | 16% |
Unknown | 96 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 82 | 22% |
Sports and Recreations | 61 | 16% |
Engineering | 6 | 2% |
Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
Other | 24 | 6% |
Unknown | 110 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,819,087
of 23,971,017 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#164
of 2,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,700
of 198,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,971,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.