↓ Skip to main content

DNA Damage Response and Repair Gene Alterations Are Associated with Improved Survival in Patients with Platinum-Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA Damage Response and Repair Gene Alterations Are Associated with Improved Survival in Patients with Platinum-Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-2520
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Yuen Teo, Richard M. Bambury, Emily C. Zabor, Emmet Jordan, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Mariel E. Boyd, Nancy Bouvier, Stephanie A. Mullane, Eugene K. Cha, Nitin Roper, Irina Ostrovnaya, David M. Hyman, Bernard H. Bochner, Maria E. Arcila, David B. Solit, Michael F. Berger, Dean F. Bajorin, Joaquim Bellmunt, Gopakumar Iyer, Jonathan E. Rosenberg

Abstract

Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma by inducing DNA damage. We hypothesize that somatic alterations in DNA damage response and repair (DDR) genes are associated with improved sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with diagnosis of locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy who had exon sequencing with MSK-IMPACT assay were identified. Patients were dichotomized based on presence/absence of alterations in a panel of 34 DDR genes. DDR alteration status was correlated with clinical outcomes and disease features. One hundred patients were identified, of which 47 harbored alterations in DDR genes. Patients with DDR alterations had improved progression-free survival (9.3 vs. 6.0 months, log rank p=0.007) and overall survival (23.7 vs. 13.0 months, log rank p=0.006). DDR alterations were also associated with higher number mutations and copy number alterations. A trend towards positive correlation between DDR status and nodal metastases and inverse correlation with visceral metastases were observed. Different DDR pathways also suggested variable impact on clinical outcomes. Somatic DDR alteration is associated with improved clinical outcomes in platinum-treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Once validated, it can improve patient selection for clinical practice and future study enrollment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Other 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 47 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 55 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#18,529,032
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#11,433
of 12,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,927
of 312,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#225
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.