| Title |
Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-010-1588-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathy Schilling, Deepa Narayanan, Judith E. Kalinyak, Juliette The, Maria Victoria Velasquez, Simone Kahn, Matthew Saady, Ravinder Mahal, Larraine Chrystal |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission mammography (PEM) with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a presurgical imaging and planning option for index and ipsilateral lesions in patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven breast cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 47% |
| Engineering | 12 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,059,050
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1,686
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,032
of 99,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.