↓ Skip to main content

Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy: No Differences Between Medial and Lateral Osteotomy Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy: No Differences Between Medial and Lateral Osteotomy Approaches
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3040-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Preston, James Howard, Douglas Naudie, Lyndsay Somerville, James McAuley

Abstract

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has long been accepted as an effective treatment for unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee in young, active adults. For varus knees, the two most commonly performed valgus-producing HTOs are the lateral closing wedge and the medial opening wedge. Regardless of technique, some HTOs fail and are converted to TKA. To our knowledge, no studies have directly compared TKAs done after lateral closing-wedge osteotomies to those done after medial opening-wedge osteotomies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Other 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,335
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,260
of 205,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#96
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.