↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic repair of a large pericardial hernia

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic repair of a large pericardial hernia
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00464-013-2820-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chan W. Park, Aurora D. Pryor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 36%
Professor 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,369
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,734
of 6,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,767
of 287,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#97
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.