↓ Skip to main content

Health impacts of domestic coal use in China

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health impacts of domestic coal use in China
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 1999
DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3427
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert B. Finkelman, Harvey E. Belkin, Baoshan Zheng

Abstract

Domestic coal combustion has had profound adverse effects on the health of millions of people worldwide. In China alone several hundred million people commonly burn raw coal in unvented stoves that permeate their homes with high levels of toxic metals and organic compounds. At least 3,000 people in Guizhou Province in southwest China are suffering from severe arsenic poisoning. The primary source of the arsenic appears to be consumption of chili peppers dried over fires fueled with high-arsenic coal. Coal samples in the region were found to contain up to 35,000 ppm arsenic. Chili peppers dried over high-arsenic coal fires adsorb 500 ppm arsenic on average. More than 10 million people in Guizhou Province and surrounding areas suffer from dental and skeletal fluorosis. The excess fluorine is caused by eating corn dried over burning briquettes made from high-fluorine coals and high-fluorine clay binders. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons formed during coal combustion are believed to cause or contribute to the high incidence of esophageal and lung cancers in parts of China. Domestic coal combustion also has caused selenium poisoning and possibly mercury poisoning. Better knowledge of coal quality parameters may help to reduce some of these health problems. For example, information on concentrations and distributions of potentially toxic elements in coal may help delineate areas of a coal deposit to be avoided. Information on the modes of occurrence of these elements and the textural relations of the minerals and macerals in coal may help predict the behavior of the potentially toxic components during coal combustion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Chile 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,302,476
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#18,471
of 102,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#561
of 35,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#15
of 562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.