↓ Skip to main content

Social frailty in older adults: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Ageing, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 404)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
Title
Social frailty in older adults: a scoping review
Published in
European Journal of Ageing, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10433-017-0414-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Bunt, N. Steverink, J. Olthof, C. P. van der Schans, J. S. M. Hobbelen

Abstract

Social frailty is a rather unexplored concept. In this paper, the concept of social frailty among older people is explored utilizing a scoping review. In the first stage, 42 studies related to social frailty of older people were compiled from scientific databases and analyzed. In the second stage, the findings of this literature were structured using the social needs concept of Social Production Function theory. As a result, it was concluded that social frailty can be defined as a continuum of being at risk of losing, or having lost, resources that are important for fulfilling one or more basic social needs during the life span. Moreover, the results of this scoping review indicate that not only the (threat of) absence of social resources to fulfill basic social needs should be a component of the concept of social frailty, but also the (threat of) absence of social behaviors and social activities, as well as (threat of) the absence of self-management abilities. This conception of social frailty provides opportunities for future research, and guidelines for practice and policy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 302 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 14%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 104 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 13%
Social Sciences 30 10%
Psychology 16 5%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 120 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,610,745
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Ageing
#45
of 404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,215
of 430,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Ageing
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.